🔗 Share this article

Throughout the initial chapters of Authentic: The Myth of Bringing Your Full Self to Work, author Jodi-Ann Burey raises a critical point: everyday advice to “bring your true self” or “present your real identity in the workplace” are not benevolent calls for individuality – they can be pitfalls. This initial publication – a combination of personal stories, investigation, societal analysis and interviews – attempts to expose how organizations co-opt identity, shifting the responsibility of corporate reform on to staff members who are often marginalized.

Professional Experience and Wider Environment

The driving force for the publication stems partly in Burey’s personal work history: different positions across business retail, emerging businesses and in international development, viewed through her perspective as a disabled Black female. The two-fold position that the author encounters – a tension between expressing one’s identity and looking for safety – is the core of her work.

It lands at a moment of general weariness with corporate clichés across America and other regions, as resistance to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs mount, and various institutions are reducing the very structures that earlier assured change and reform. The author steps into that terrain to assert that retreating from the language of authenticity – that is, the business jargon that reduces individuality as a grouping of appearances, quirks and pastimes, keeping workers concerned with controlling how they are viewed rather than how they are treated – is not the answer; instead, we need to redefine it on our personal terms.

Marginalized Workers and the Performance of Identity

Via detailed stories and conversations, the author demonstrates how marginalized workers – individuals of color, LGBTQ+ people, women, people with disabilities – quickly realize to modulate which identity will “be acceptable”. A sensitive point becomes a disadvantage and people try too hard by attempting to look acceptable. The act of “presenting your true self” becomes a reflective surface on which numerous kinds of anticipations are projected: emotional labor, sharing personal information and ongoing display of gratitude. According to Burey, we are asked to reveal ourselves – but lacking the defenses or the reliance to withstand what comes out.

As Burey explains, we are asked to reveal ourselves – but lacking the defenses or the reliance to survive what arises.’

Case Study: The Story of Jason

The author shows this phenomenon through the narrative of an employee, a hearing-impaired staff member who took it upon himself to teach his colleagues about the culture of the deaf community and communication norms. His willingness to share his experience – a gesture of openness the organization often commends as “sincerity” – temporarily made routine exchanges more manageable. Yet, the author reveals, that progress was precarious. When employee changes wiped out the casual awareness the employee had developed, the culture of access vanished. “Everything he taught left with them,” he notes wearily. What remained was the exhaustion of having to start over, of having to take charge for an company’s developmental journey. From the author’s perspective, this illustrates to be told to expose oneself absent defenses: to endanger oneself in a framework that applauds your transparency but fails to formalize it into policy. Sincerity becomes a pitfall when companies count on individual self-disclosure rather than institutional answerability.

Writing Style and Idea of Resistance

Her literary style is simultaneously lucid and lyrical. She blends academic thoroughness with a tone of kinship: an offer for readers to participate, to challenge, to disagree. According to the author, professional resistance is not loud rebellion but ethical rejection – the practice of opposing uniformity in settings that expect thankfulness for basic acceptance. To resist, according to her view, is to challenge the accounts organizations narrate about equity and acceptance, and to reject participation in rituals that maintain unfairness. It may appear as calling out discrimination in a gathering, withdrawing of unpaid “inclusion” work, or setting boundaries around how much of one’s identity is provided to the institution. Dissent, the author proposes, is an declaration of self-respect in environments that frequently reward compliance. It represents a practice of principle rather than rebellion, a way of maintaining that an individual’s worth is not conditional on corporate endorsement.

Reclaiming Authenticity

She also refuses inflexible opposites. Authentic does not merely eliminate “sincerity” wholesale: instead, she advocates for its reclamation. For Burey, sincerity is far from the unfiltered performance of individuality that organizational atmosphere frequently praises, but a more thoughtful correspondence between individual principles and one’s actions – a principle that resists alteration by institutional demands. Instead of treating authenticity as a directive to overshare or conform to sterilized models of openness, Burey advises followers to maintain the parts of it rooted in truth-telling, self-awareness and principled vision. From her perspective, the aim is not to give up on genuineness but to shift it – to transfer it from the executive theatrical customs and toward interactions and workplaces where reliance, justice and accountability make {